Page 1 of 1

PSA 10 alpha lotus signed

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:55 am
by AzureWinter
is it worth this much?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 0106081811

*editted link

Re: PSA 10 alpha lotus signed

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:15 am
by dragsamou
AzureWinter wrote:is it worth this much?
http://cgi.ebay.com/MTG-Magic-Black-Lot ... dZViewItem
Hi.
Link not working:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 0106081811
Well for me with that Signature,he canno't be a Mint 10....

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:10 pm
by l0qii
PSA had reported at one time that another PSA 10 Alpha Lotus was sold privately for $15000.

A PSA 10 Beta Lotus sold on eBay for $6000 2 years ago

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:05 pm
by squt
I thought an autograph would make it so that it couldn't be a 10?

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:18 pm
by dragsamou
squt wrote:I thought an autograph would make it so that it couldn't be a 10?
Hi Mark.
So,any cards with Alteration can be certified PSA 10 under that logic :-||
PSA experts also examine trading cards for authenticity. PSA will not encapsulate cards that bear evidence of trimming, re-coloring, restoration, or any other forms of tampering. When you own a card in a PSA holder, you know that PSA experts have verified that it is genuine and that it has not been artificially enhanced.
Between a Black Lotus PSA 10 and a Black Lotus PSA 10 Signed,one should be called "GEM MINT" and the other "SIGNED MINT".IMHO

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:18 pm
by l0qii
dragsamou wrote: Between a Black Lotus PSA 10 and a Black Lotus PSA 10 Signed,one should be called "GEM MINT" and the other "SIGNED MINT".IMHO
While both are labelled "GEM MINT 10", one is PSA and the other is PSA/DNA. The PSA population report tracks both differently. So really they are doing what you say only using the word "DNA" instead of "SIGNED"

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:01 pm
by Royal Ass.
Do they validate the signature? Or do they simply say it's "DNA" meaning that it has a signature but it could be anyone.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:03 pm
by l0qii
Royal Ass. wrote:Do they validate the signature? Or do they simply say it's "DNA" meaning that it has a signature but it could be anyone.
They validate it for authenticity. There criteria for this is anyone's guess, but they're pretty well trusted in the sporting and entertainment world.
http://www.psadna.com/

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:17 pm
by Royal Ass.
His sig has changed a bit from other cards i have signed by him (including my lotus). I dont like the location of where he signed on that card as well. i like better when he signes at the bottom.
It doesnt distract from the card quite as much.

My lotus for refrence ;-)
Image

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:31 pm
by l0qii
Ended at $9500

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:58 pm
by Royal Ass.
do we know who bought it?

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 10:05 pm
by lickaneye
Don't think so

Posted: Mon May 30, 2011 12:12 am
by Ertai's Familiar
lickaneye wrote:Don't think so
Why are you bumping 4 year old threads all around the forum?

Posted: Mon May 30, 2011 12:25 am
by AXIOS
lickaneye wrote:Don't think so
this is without a doubt, the most USELESS post ever!