Everything about value and availability of Magic items.
Moderators: cataclysm80, Apocalypse2K, berkumps, dragsamou, mystical_tutor, pp, hammr7, l0qii
-
yvel
- Librarities Legend
- Posts: 1190
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:33 pm
- Location: Paris - France
-
Contact:
Post
by yvel » Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:05 am
Thanks for your help
-
berkumps
- Legendary AA Coffin Puppet Master
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:56 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
Contact:
Post
by berkumps » Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:02 pm
Is it rebacked?
-
yvel
- Librarities Legend
- Posts: 1190
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:33 pm
- Location: Paris - France
-
Contact:
Post
by yvel » Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:29 pm
Don't think so, I have only this scan.
-
Magic61983
- Librarities Legend
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:28 pm
- Location: Willowdale, PA
Post
by Magic61983 » Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:50 pm
Just from the scans I'm pretty confident it's a reback or the back doesn't match the front alignment wise. The front is off center to the left a but and the back is perfect. This would be the reason behind the card having the crease in the dead center of the card. Worth 0 to a collector but as a proxy someone may want it.
BGS 9+ Alpha set 282/295 (97.29%) Avg 9.41
BGS 9.5+ Beta set 283/302 (93.71%) Avg 9.58
BGS 9.5+ Arabian set 35/92 (38.04%) Avg 9.62
BGS 9.5+ Antiquities set 82/100 (82%) Avg 9.64
BGS 9.5+ Legends set 279/310 (90.00%) Avg 9.61
-
mystical_tutor
- Legendary Old Fart Magic Player
- Posts: 3056
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:02 am
- Location: Colorado Springs
Post
by mystical_tutor » Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:56 pm
It kinda looks like the vertical centering doesn't match either.
Gary
-
yvel
- Librarities Legend
- Posts: 1190
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:33 pm
- Location: Paris - France
-
Contact:
Post
by yvel » Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:00 pm
Magic61983 wrote:Worth 0 to a collector but as a proxy someone may want it.
Thanks for the info :)
-
Magic61983
- Librarities Legend
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:28 pm
- Location: Willowdale, PA
Post
by Magic61983 » Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:43 pm
yvel wrote:Magic61983 wrote:Worth 0 to a collector but as a proxy someone may want it.
Thanks for the info :)
That is if the card is a reback....but I'm almost certain it is. Although some cards from back in the day did have some printing issues were the backs were off center from the fronts although they are pretty rare.
BGS 9+ Alpha set 282/295 (97.29%) Avg 9.41
BGS 9.5+ Beta set 283/302 (93.71%) Avg 9.58
BGS 9.5+ Arabian set 35/92 (38.04%) Avg 9.62
BGS 9.5+ Antiquities set 82/100 (82%) Avg 9.64
BGS 9.5+ Legends set 279/310 (90.00%) Avg 9.61
-
yvel
- Librarities Legend
- Posts: 1190
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:33 pm
- Location: Paris - France
-
Contact:
Post
by yvel » Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:58 am
lol thanks a lot,
so i guess this card fail the bend test :)
-
NeRo
- Librarities Legend
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:31 pm
Post
by NeRo » Tue Aug 14, 2012 4:24 pm
yvel wrote:so i guess this card fail the bend test :)
No way that this damage is from bending the card once or twice - even if it is rebacked. I am pretty sure it was folded on purpose.
Maybe so that one can say - "hey it survived this so it has to be authentic".
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests